Opinion by: Dan Hughes, founder of Radix
The crypto industry has long placed its hopes on layer-2 (L2) solutions as the ultimate fix for scalability issues. But what if they are actually jeopardizing us?
This preoccupation hasn’t facilitated mass adoption; instead, it has crafted a convoluted network of rollups, bridges, and fragmented liquidity that undermines the fundamental principles of blockchain—decentralization and security. The vision of a smooth, decentralized network is diminishing, overshadowed by a complicated system that mirrors the inefficiencies and centralization found in traditional finance. Are we genuinely fostering innovation, or are we merely replicating past mistakes?
The blockchain trilemma
L2s were intended to address the blockchain trilemma. However, while they may cover individual gaps, collectively, L2 solutions risk compromising all three critical aspects—security, scalability, and decentralization.
The sheer volume of L2s has produced a disjointed ecosystem that’s tough to navigate, leaning heavily on complex rollups and bridging solutions. This centralization draws assets into isolated liquidity pools, undermining security and stifling competition, particularly for smaller initiatives.
These so-called solutions have also introduced significant friction and unnecessary security vulnerabilities. Even though bridge-related hacking incidents are much rarer now, cybercriminals will invariably discover new methods to exploit rollups, channels, and sidechains.
The dependence of many L2s on sequencers or trusted validators opens further vulnerabilities, creating single points of failure, while siloed liquidity limits the availability of validators for lesser-known L2s, ultimately threatening network resilience.
Moreover, these solutions pose substantial technical hurdles for developers aiming to create applications that interact with L2s, necessitating extensive and specialized knowledge of the operational mechanics of each L2 involved.
Advocates for L2 solutions may claim that the trade-offs are manageable; however, there are deeper issues at stake beyond merely sacrificing security, scalability, or liquidity.
Recent: AI has witnessed its Cambrian moment — Blockchain’s is still pending
The ultimate aim for crypto is a universal network where any asset or decentralized application can seamlessly and securely engage with one another. Unfortunately, the friction introduced by L2s undermines this immediate interoperability, while the centralization of sequencers and validators erodes the trustless foundation of the system. This not only hampers scalability in decentralized finance (DeFi) but may also lead to a new iteration of the fragmented, siloed, intermediary-heavy traditional finance system.
To propel DeFi forward, achieving an on-chain financial ecosystem that surpasses what currently exists is imperative.
Building the foundations
Crypto must invest in building robust foundations. Rather than relegating scalability and security elsewhere, blockchain networks should prioritize these attributes at layer 1.
Sharding presents a viable path forward, but the industry needs to pursue loftier objectives and develop an enduring solution instead of merely applying temporary fixes to today’s scalability challenges. It’s not solely about increasing the number of shards; it’s about how sharding is executed. The Beacon Chain creates additional bottlenecks, and dynamic sharding complicates matters, imposing significant overhead. Even intra-validator sharding appears to address many concerns until resource saturation occurs at the network-facing node, which must manage all transactions, ultimately postponing the issue in search of more validators and yielding diminishing returns.
A clear answer for scaling DeFi to parallel the capabilities of traditional finance is state sharding, where the blockchain’s state is distributed across multiple shards. Transactions that encompass states from various shards trigger a temporary consensus process.
The validators handling the transaction state communicate, agree (or not), and atomically update the state across all relevant shards. This allows for parallel transaction processing spanning multiple shards and even within the shards themselves, enabling each shard to focus solely on transactions that modify the state for which they are accountable, thereby significantly enhancing throughput without sacrificing decentralization or access.
When these shards are integrated with atomic commitment, any transaction failure results in a clean abort, eliminating the need for untangling leftover state changes.
This is merely one potential solution. The future of DeFi is poised to onboard a global audience. The critical question remains how soon and by what methods. Ultimately, solutions that emphasize fundamental layer 1 development over a patchwork of L2s will eliminate fragmentation, simplify complexity, and re-establish scalability and accessibility at the core of blockchain networks. It boils down to the future developers want to champion—tokenomics or the foundational tenets of Web3: decentralization, efficiency, and security.
Scaling for the future
Layer 1 solutions benefit everyone. They fortify the primary structure of the ecosystem for developers, traders, everyday users, and billions of potential new users. Without a resilient and scalable foundational architecture, a single powerful push could cause this precarious structure to collapse. While some specific use cases may benefit from L2 solutions—like high-frequency trade settlements—these are exceptions that do not undermine the broader rule. From an ecosystem-wide perspective, developers must concentrate on integrated, native scalability solutions rather than simply layering more complexity and unstable “solutions” on top. Neglecting layer 1 will only lead to future complications.
Opinion by: Dan Hughes, founder of Radix.
This article provides general information and should not be construed as legal or investment advice. The insights expressed here reflect the author’s individual views and do not necessarily represent the views of any other entity.