Cointelegraph Bitcoin & Ethereum Blockchain News

What is Typosquatting in Cryptocurrency?

Typosquatting in cryptocurrencies consists of registering domain names that closely resemble those of well-known platforms, with minor spelling errors, to trick users into disclosing sensitive data.

The digital landscape is rapidly changing, and cryptocurrencies have emerged as a notable means of currency, allowing for decentralized and borderless financial transactions.

As their popularity increases, so do the accompanying cyber threats. One such threat is typosquatting—a deceptive scheme in which cybercriminals register domain names that closely imitate those of authentic cryptocurrency platforms. By taking advantage of common typing mistakes, these attackers aim to mislead users into accessing fraudulent sites that can lead to financial loss and security breaches.

For example, a user trying to reach “coinbase.com” might mistakenly type “coinbsae.com,” ending up on a malicious website designed to look like the real thing.

These imitation platforms frequently prompt users to enter private information, such as private keys or recovery phrases, or to download malware disguised as legitimate applications. Consequently, unsuspecting users may unintentionally expose their digital assets to theft or compromise their personal information.

The “typo” in typosquatting underscores its dependence on common keyboard errors. This misleading practice is also known as domain mimicry, URL hijacking, or the creation of trap sites.

The pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions complicates the recovery of stolen funds, making typosquatting a particularly malicious risk within the cryptocurrency realm.

In June 2019, six individuals were apprehended in the UK and Netherlands following a 14-month investigation into a €24 million cryptocurrency theft. This heist targeted Bitcoin wallets and involved typosquatting, with cybercriminals constructing bogus cryptocurrency exchange websites to pilfer login information. More than 4,000 victims in 12 countries were affected, and Europol, along with national agencies, coordinated the operation leading to arrests in both nations.

To protect against such schemes, it is crucial for users to exercise caution, verify URLs diligently, and utilize security features like bookmarks for frequently accessed sites. Developers and service providers should actively monitor for and respond to potential typosquatting domains to safeguard their users.

Mechanics of Typosquatting in Cryptocurrency

Cybercriminals leverage typosquatting in cryptocurrency by registering deceptive domains, creating counterfeit websites, and employing phishing tactics to garner credentials, redirect funds, or install malware.

Let’s delve into these tactics further:

• Domain Registration: Malicious actors carefully register domains that are minor variations of well-known cryptocurrency platforms or services. For instance, they might change a letter or add a character to a popular domain name, like registering “bitcoiin.com” instead of “bitcoin.com.” This slight modification takes advantage of users who make typographical mistakes when entering web addresses. Studies have identified scams where attackers exploited Blockchain Naming Systems (BNS) domain names very similar to established brands, leading to considerable financial losses.
• Phishing and Malware Distribution: Scammers have mastered the art of manipulating small typos to deceive individuals into misdirecting cryptocurrency payments to wallets controlled by them. These attackers can employ phishing methods to steal credentials, install malware on user devices, or convince users to authorize fraudulent transactions. Malware can further compromise the device, resulting in additional security risks.
• Deceptive Websites: These domains host sites that closely resemble the legitimate platforms, often replicating the user interface and design. Users who mistakenly arrive at these counterfeit sites may be asked to enter sensitive information like private keys, recovery phrases, or login credentials. This data can then be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access to user accounts or wallets.

Did you know? Researchers analyzing 4.9 million BNS names and 200 million transactions found that typosquatters are actively exploiting these systems, with user funds being sent to fraudulent addresses due to simple typographical errors.

Common Targets of Typosquatting in Cryptocurrency

Typosquatting mainly targets wallets, tokens, and websites within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

• Wallets: Attackers generate wallet addresses or domains that closely resemble those of legitimate wallets. Users aiming to send funds may unintentionally direct assets to these fraudulent addresses, leading to financial loss. For instance, a legitimate Ethereum wallet address might be “0xAbCdEf1234567890…” while a fraudulent one could be “0xAbCdEf1234567891…” with just one digit altered.
• Tokens: Fake token names are registered to mislead users into transferring funds to dishonest addresses. Scammers create counterfeit tokens using names or symbols nearly identical to authentic ones. Unsuspecting investors might buy these fake tokens under the impression they are genuine, which can result in substantial financial loss. For example, a legitimate token may be Uniswap (UNI), while a fraudulent token could be “Unisswap” or “UniSwap Classic.”
• Websites: Users are at risk of phishing attacks via websites that closely imitate genuine cryptocurrency platforms. These fraudulent sites, with nearly identical domain names, are used to steal credentials and spread malware, posing significant security threats. For instance, a phishing domain might be “myetherwallett.com” (with two “t”s in “wallet”) instead of the correct “myetherwallet.com.”

How Typosquatting Affects Developers and Users in Cryptocurrency

Typosquatting in the crypto realm leads to reputational harm and financial loss for developers, as well as data theft and malware issues for users.

Impact on Cryptocurrency Developers

Developers of cryptocurrency projects face numerous challenges due to typosquatting:

• Reputational Damage: Malicious agents registering domains similar to legitimate cryptocurrency services can mislead users, pushing them towards fraudulent platforms. This misdirection can lead to users associating negative experiences with the original service, harming its reputation.
• Financial Harm: Attackers may take advantage of typosquatting to divert funds intended for legitimate services. This redirection affects both users and may disrupt the developer’s revenue, stunting project growth. The extent of these financial losses can be considerable, as shown by cases where typosquatting scams resulted in millions of dollars being stolen.

Did you know? The SEC claims that operators of counterfeit crypto exchanges NanoBit and CoinW6 stole $3.2 million after gaining the trust of investors through social media, resulting in legal actions against eight parties.

Impact on Cryptocurrency Users

Users are particularly susceptible to the tactics used by typosquatters:

• Financial Losses: Users who accidentally interact with fraudulent sites due to typographical errors may incur direct financial losses. Those deceived by typos in BNS have sent cryptocurrency to attackers rather than their intended recipients, resulting in significant financial damage.
• Theft of Sensitive Information: Imitation websites designed to look like official cryptocurrency platforms can deceive users into revealing sensitive data, such as private keys. This data can then be exploited by criminals to access and steal money from users’ wallets, significantly compromising their security.
• Malware Infections: In addition to phishing attacks, typosquatting sites can serve as a means for malware distribution. Users visiting these sites risk their devices being infected with malicious software, leading to a variety of security breaches. This could result in unauthorized access to personal data, financial losses, and possibly even allow the malware to spread to other systems, making them unwitting participants in larger cyberattacks.

Cybersquatting vs. Typosquatting in Cryptocurrency

Both cybersquatting and typosquatting involve deceptive domain registrations, but they differ in intent and execution.

Cybercriminals register domains that resemble established cryptocurrency projects or exchanges, often demanding a ransom for the domain or using it to mislead users. This practice is referred to as cybersquatting.

For instance, someone might register EthereumExchange.com prior to Ethereum launching its official exchange, intending to sell it later for profit.

In contrast, typosquatting involves creating domains with minor spelling variations of legitimate cryptocurrency platforms to trick users into visiting fraudulent sites, stealing credentials, or deploying malware.

For example, a scammer could register Binannce.com (with a double “n”) to imitate Binance and steal user logins.

Below is a brief summary of how cybersquatting differs from typosquatting:

Legal Challenges of Typosquatting in the Crypto Industry

Typosquatting within the cryptocurrency field not only poses security threats but also presents significant legal obstacles.

These include:

• Intellectual Property Infringement vs. Intent: Determining whether there is a clear case of trademark infringement can often be complex. Courts frequently struggle to prove “intent to deceive.” Did the typosquatter intentionally aim to mislead users, or was it merely a “harmless” mistake? In the crypto world, where anonymity is highly valued, proving malicious intent can be immensely challenging.
• Jurisdictional Complications: The borderless nature of cryptocurrency dramatically conflicts with conventional legal systems. When a scammer in one country typosquats a domain affecting users in multiple other nations, where should action begin? Which laws should be applied? This complexity creates a tangled web of international legal issues, complicating enforcement.
• The Evolving Definition of “Consumer Harm”: Traditional consumer protection statutes are struggling to keep pace with the unique dangers of cryptocurrency. Losing one’s private key due to a typosquatting scam isn’t the same as falling victim to a faulty product. Courts are re-evaluating what defines “consumer harm” in this digital landscape, which leads to new legal uncertainties.
• Domain Name Disputes and UDRP: The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is typically utilized for resolving domain name disputes. However, its efficacy in the crypto domain is debatable. Cryptocurrency projects may not consistently hold formal trademarks, often required for a successful UDRP claim, leaving certain projects particularly vulnerable.
• Smart Contract Exploitation: In some instances, typosquatting could redirect individuals to smart contracts designed to steal funds. This raises further complexities, as the code itself might be seen as a tool for fraud. Questions arise regarding whether smart contracts are legal documents and their applicability as evidence in court.
• Criminal Accountability and Money Laundering: Beyond civil litigation, typosquatting can also result in criminal charges, especially when linked with money laundering. If scammers utilize these fake sites for redirecting stolen cryptocurrency, they enter serious legal territory. Law enforcement is progressively tracking these digital trails, leading to potentially severe penalties.

How to Detect and Prevent Typosquatting in Cryptocurrency Markets

To combat typosquatting in the cryptocurrency world, developers and users must actively monitor domains, secure similar names, educate users, implement security measures, and collaborate with relevant authorities.

To reduce the risks related to typosquatting, those involved in cryptocurrencies can take the following actions:

• Domain Monitoring: Regularly track domain registrations that resemble your brand or service to identify potential typosquatting attempts. This proactive method allows for prompt action against unauthorized domains.
• Secure Similar Domains: Register common misspellings or variations of your domain name to prevent malicious actors from using them. Owning these variations can redirect genuine traffic to your official site and hinder fraudulent sites from gaining traction.
• User Education: Encourage users to act as “digital detectives.” Inform them about the dangers of typosquatting and promote awareness when entering URLs or interacting with cryptocurrency services. Providing clear guidelines on distinguishing official websites and avoiding phishing attacks can empower users to safeguard themselves.
• Implement Security Features: Enhance user confidence and deter typosquatting by using Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates, displaying trust seals, and ensuring accuracy in URLs. A secure site protected by SSL reduces the risk of attacks and motivates user engagement.
• Collaborate with Authorities: Engage with domain registrars, law enforcement, and regulatory bodies to address and prevent typosquatting incidents. Teamwork can lead to the removal of fraudulent domains and the prosecution of perpetrators, improving the overall security of the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Reporting Typosquatting-Related Cryptocurrency Crimes

To report typosquatting-related crypto crime globally, begin by notifying the domain registrar, seeking legal advice for complex scenarios, informing crypto platforms of fraudulent transfers, and documenting transactions through blockchain explorers. In the US, UK, and Australia, report to appropriate national cybercrime and intellectual property agencies.

Regardless of location, specific steps should be followed when reporting typosquatting incidents in the crypto realm. Initially, it is essential to report the fraudulent domain to the registrar responsible for it. Most registrars have established procedures for processing abuse reports.

Next, for intricate or international cases, it is wise to seek legal counsel specializing in cybercrime and intellectual property law. Additionally, if the typosquatting led to funds being sent to a fraudulent wallet, the relevant cryptocurrency exchange or wallet provider should be informed.

Finally, utilizing blockchain explorers to document transactions to fraudulent addresses can provide essential evidence.

Here’s how to report typosquatting-related crypto crime in the US, UK, and Australia:

• United States: Report general cybercrime to the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), which partners with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center. For trademark issues, reach out to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Domain disputes can be handled through ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP).
• United Kingdom: Report general fraud to Action Fraud, the national reporting center. For trademark infringements, submit a report to the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO). Domain disputes are managed through ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP).
• Australia: Report cyber incidents to the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) and cybercrimes via ReportCyber. Domain name disputes can be resolved through ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP).

Typosquatting continues to be a pervasive threat in the cryptocurrency sector, necessitating vigilance from both developers and users. By understanding its workings and implementing preventive measures, stakeholders can lessen risks and cultivate a more secure digital currency environment.