Why Some Blockchains Fail
Blockchains can falter due to ineffective tokenomics, fraudulent activities, security vulnerabilities, or a lack of community and development activity. Without ongoing engagement, even the most advanced technologies can be rendered obsolete.
Have you ever come across a blockchain that remains unused? Such scenarios are more common than you might imagine. The cryptocurrency domain is rich with innovation, yet not every blockchain successfully cultivates a dedicated user base. Some become deserted wastelands, experiencing no transactions, featuring no developers, and leaving a handful of investors stuck with virtually worthless tokens. So, what causes a blockchain to stagnate? Is there a possibility for revival?
Not every blockchain is equipped for longevity. Networks like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana have demonstrated their durability amidst challenging market conditions. In contrast, Terra fell from grace, plummeting from its former prominence to near extinction in 2022 after its algorithmic stablecoin collapsed.
Well-intentioned projects can also meet their demise. Without consistent development, incentives for users, or a passionate community, blockchains can become effectively inoperable. When validators cease to run nodes, the network essentially becomes a non-functional artifact of the past.
Challenges for Blockchain Adoption in 2025
In 2025, blockchain adoption still confronts obstacles such as ambiguous regulation, disjointed developer tools, infrastructural shortcomings, and the difficulty of attracting genuine users instead of bots. Despite pathways cleared by networks like Ethereum and Solana, these challenges persist.
One of the major impediments is regulatory uncertainty. Governments are still figuring out how to oversee cryptocurrencies, and inconsistent or overly stringent regulations can stifle innovation before it begins. Beyond regulatory issues, a thriving developer ecosystem is essential. Navigating between languages like Solidity, Rust, and various Move-based frameworks requires adaptability, which not every blockchain can provide to attract the talent necessary for growth.
On the user side, many networks are inundated with bots seeking airdrops rather than authentic engagement from real individuals. Without genuine activity, a network’s bustling statistics can be misleading.
Infrastructure also presents a significant barrier. Successful blockchains require strong tools, quality remote procedure call (RPC) services, and a decentralized validator set to ensure uptime and security. In this context, RPC services allow applications (like wallets, DApps, or developer tools) to interact with a blockchain network from a distance.
Moreover, a thriving blockchain must cultivate a committed community of users, developers, and commentators who genuinely believe in its long-term success.
Effectively addressing fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) is another challenge, especially when negative narratives arise. A blockchain ecosystem’s response can either strengthen or weaken trust. Managing user loyalty while inspiring a sense of newness is a delicate balancing act.
Ethereum has successfully navigated this across various market cycles, evolving while maintaining a solid core of developers and users. Following the collapse of FTX in 2022, Solana has shown resilience, rebuilding its ecosystem, drawing in developers, and enhancing genuine usage through progress in efficiency and community backing.
Did You Know? Blockchain nodes offer RPC endpoints (often via HTTP or WebSocket protocols) to handle requests. For instance, when using a decentralized app (DApp) on Ethereum, it might connect to an RPC service like Infura or Alchemy to retrieve data or send transactions.
Active Blockchains in 2025
As of April 2025, networks such as Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin, BNB Chain, Polkadot, Near, Sui, and Tron stand out as active blockchains, each excelling in specific areas like DApps, speed, value storage, affordability, interoperability, or scalability.
Active blockchains exhibit daily user interactions, development momentum, and sustained transaction activity, while inactive ones transition into digital graveyards.
While not every blockchain is defunct, many are not flourishing either. Here’s a look at the key players that are shaping the crypto landscape as of April 2025:
-
Bitcoin: Focused on value preservation, Bitcoin boasts a market cap of $1.636 trillion as of April 6, 2025, with regular transactions. Factors like the 2024 halving and the approval of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) keep it significant. With around 960 developers working on scalability efforts, such as the Lightning Network, Bitcoin continues to thrive despite limited smart contract features.
-
Ethereum: Powering decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and DApps, Ethereum is handling millions of daily transactions through layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum as of April 2025. It had over 5,900 active developers in June 2023. Although the high total value locked (TVL) continues to be a strong point, gas fees present challenges, especially without layer 2 options.
-
Solana: As reported by DefiLlama, Solana achieved 3.68 million active addresses daily as of April 8, 2025. This surge is likely supported by its rapid transactions and minimal fees. After recovering from the downturn following the 2022 FTX incident, Solana focuses on gaming and DeFi. It had over 1,400 developers in June 2023, although past outages raise concerns. Notably, the TRUMP token’s crash in March 2025, dropping over 85% from its January peak, has put additional strain on Solana’s momentum.
-
BNB Chain: Binance’s BNB Chain recorded 1.93 million active users as of April 1, 2025, with cost-effective transactions. It demonstrates significant TVL and transaction volume, especially in DeFi and gaming, though its centralized structure is under scrutiny.
-
Polkadot: Aiming to connect various blockchains, Polkadot had over 1,900 developers in June 2023 focusing on interoperability. As of April 2025, it supports several parachains, with moderate but rising activity, although it might be less user-friendly for casual participants.
-
Near Protocol: Near recorded 3.18 million daily addresses as of April 1, 2025, employing sharding for better scalability. It backs DeFi and gaming while providing developer tools for growth but still needs to validate its place among larger networks.
-
Sui: With 2.46 million daily users as of April 1, 2025, Sui leverages an object-oriented model for speed. Active in DeFi and gaming, it is still new and lacks the extensive ecosystem found in older chains.
- Tron: With 2.45 million daily addresses as of April 1, 2025, Tron concentrates on stablecoin transfers, such as Tether USDt (USDT). It handles substantial throughput but offers fewer DApp options compared to its peers.
Inactive chains like EOS and Terra, which have suffered from governance disputes or collapse, contrast sharply with the more active networks discussed.
Ultimately, a blockchain’s success hinges on its daily usage. How many transactions occur on a chain each day? Are developers still creating new DApps? Is there any significant transaction volume? If the answers lean toward “not much,” that chain could be on the verge of becoming a digital wasteland.
Did You Know? As per Santiment, the top five Ethereum-based cryptocurrencies based on development activity in March 2025 were Chainlink (LINK), Starknet (STRK), Ether (ETH), EigenLayer (EIGEN), and Fuel Network (FUEL). This ranking reflects development frequency, which is a key indicator of potential growth and innovation within the crypto sector.
Blockchains That Disappeared: What Went Wrong?
Blockchains such as EOS and Terra remind us that mere hype isn’t sufficient for survival. A blockchain must provide real utility, build trust, and foster continuous innovation to endure.
The experiences of EOS and Terra demonstrate that initial excitement cannot ensure lasting success. A blockchain’s long-term viability appears to hinge on genuine utility, trustworthiness, and ongoing development rather than transient hype.
Some chains launched with great promise but struggled to maintain momentum. EOS, once branded an "Ethereum killer," raised $4 billion during its 2017 initial coin offering (ICO). By 2025, it experienced minimal usage due to governance challenges and low adoption rates.
Terra and its LUNA token faced an even steeper decline in 2022 when its algorithmic stablecoin failed, leading to the loss of billions in value.
These instances show that hype alone does not guarantee longevity—blockchains require practical use cases, robust security, and active evolution.
Community involvement often differentiates between a blockchain that thrives and one that fades away. Ethereum has withstood multiple downturns, supported by a large base of developers and active users. Developers creating DApps attract users, fostering a cycle of growth. Validators and stakers enhance trust, boosting liquidity. Without this level of participation, even technically impressive chains may struggle to remain relevant.
How to Identify a Healthy Blockchain
Metrics like transaction volume, total value locked (TVL), developer activity, and the number of validators are vital indicators of a blockchain’s vitality and credibility.
So, how do you determine if a blockchain is thriving? Transaction speed and volume serve as major indicators. A strong, engaged blockchain consistently sees transactions, while minimal activity raises alarm bells. TVL is another crucial metric; a trustworthy chain will attract DeFi users willing to lock funds into its protocols. A dwindling TVL suggests users are departing.
Developer activity also plays a pivotal role. Are new initiatives launching? Is there ongoing development? A stagnant developer scene typically signals trouble. The number of validators is important too. A robust validator count suggests decentralization and network security. Finally, liquidity and the on-chain economy are fundamentally important; if liquidity is declining, the chain’s future may also be at risk.
Developers and founding teams often migrate between blockchains if they can’t scale effectively from their original platform. This shift can be costly, as rebuilding skills and user bases takes time. Nevertheless, a mass exodus of projects from a chain often signals a bearish trend, while the opposite can indicate positive momentum.
For instance, on April 3, 2025, the gaming project Infecteddotfun announced a switch from Base to Solana due to scaling difficulties. The project’s viral speculative simulation game attracted 130,000 sign-ups within 48 hours, overwhelming Base with transaction demand, leading to skyrocketing gas fees and stalling gameplay. The team cited limitations of Ethereum Virtual Machine chains, favoring Solana’s user-friendly environment and robust user community.
What Revives a Stagnant Blockchain?
Inactive blockchain networks can be revitalized by identifying compelling use cases, cultivating a strong community, providing robust incentives, or transforming into newer forms such as layer-2 solutions.
Can a once-dormant blockchain successfully revive? Occasionally, yes. The critical factor is identifying a reason for renewed interest. A new application can spark revitalized enthusiasm, especially if it addresses a genuine need. Protocol upgrades that boost scalability, reduce fees, or enhance interoperability can rekindle user activity.
Attractive incentives—such as grants, airdrops, or liquidity rewards—can bring developers and users back to the platform. In some instances, struggling networks pivot to layer-2 solutions or merge with more active ecosystems to stay relevant.
Above all, a vibrant community that is deeply committed to the chain’s future can drive its resurgence from adversity. The resurgence of Solana following the FTX fallout serves as a notable case study in this regard.
The blockchain industry moves rapidly; some networks flourish while others fade into oblivion. The most enduring are those with robust community backing, real-world applications, and ongoing innovation. A blockchain that appears silent today isn’t necessarily lost forever, but reviving it requires more than mere optimism.